[article]
| Titre : |
Russian roulette : Coating performance with or without a sulfide removal treatment |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Yasir Idlibi, Auteur ; Jason Hartt, Auteur ; Mike O'Donoghue, Auteur ; Vijay Datta, Auteur ; Bill Johnson, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2016 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 38-50 |
| Note générale : |
Bibliogr. |
| Langues : |
Américain (ame) |
| Catégories : |
Acier au carbone
Chimie -- Essais et réactifs
Epoxydes
Métaux -- Revêtements protecteurs
Polyamine cyclique
Revêtements -- Analyse:Peinture -- Analyse
Sulfures
Surfaces -- Nettoyage
|
| Index. décimale : |
667.9 Revêtements et enduits |
| Résumé : |
Worldwide, many thin- and thick-film innovative polycyclamine-cured epoxy linings have performed admirably in oil patch, high-temperature service for tank, vessel and pipe spool internals. Notwithstanding, with ever-increasing temperatures and pressure and chemical resistance requirements in oil and gas environments, the demands placed upon linings are becoming more stringent.
This article investigates whether the performance of these linings could be enhanced by first abrasive blasting the steel substrate and then providing a subsequent application (and removal) of a unique chemical reagent to remove deleterious sulfide contaminants, improve lining performance in aggressive immersion service conditions and potentially extend the life-cycles of the applied linings.
Accelerated laboratory investigations were carried out on a set of reagent-treated, and untreated, carbon steel test panels. Sets of panels were lined with a three-coat, thin-film solvent-borne epoxy novolac coating or a single coat solvent-free, thick-film polycyclamine-cured epoxy.
Characterization of the lining performance, the lining-steel interface and efficacy of the sulfide removal reagent was achieved using autoclave (NACE-TM0185), electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS), scanning electron microscopy (SEM/EDX) and X-Ray diffraction (XRD). |
| Note de contenu : |
- CANDIDATE SURFACE DECONTAMINATION TECHNOLOGY CHEMICAL CLEANING
- CANDIDATE EPOXY LININGS
- EXPERIMENTATION : Preparation and treatment of steel panels - Lining application
- TEST METHODS FOR COATING EVALUATION : Autoclave - Electrochemical impedance spectroscopy (EIS) - Adhesion and visual rating - Surface profile measurements - Conductivity measurements - SEM-EDX - X-ray diffraction
- RESULTS AND DISCUSSION : Surface profile measurement and visual observations - Conductivity measurement - SEM-EDX
- FIGURES : 1. Preparation and treatment of 42 panels prior to coating application - 2. Examples of deliberately contaminated panels - 3. Examples of pre-test panels. (Left to right): Coating 2-Panel A, Coating 1-Panel B, Coating 2-Panel B and Coating 1-Panel C - 4. Coating 1 panels, post autoclave test. (Left to right): 2A, 1B, 2B and 1C - 5. Coating 2 panels, post autoclave test. (Left to right): 2A, 1B, 2B and 1C - 6. Impedance, pre- and post-autoclave exposure - 7. (Left) Panel A, Panel B (washed, brush blasted one side; contaminated on other side) and Panel C. (Center) Panel A, SSPC-SP 5/NACE No. 1 and (Right) Panel C, SSPC-SP 5/NACE No. 1 and chemically cleaned - 8. (Top row, Left) Test panels as received, (Center) unpacking of Test Panel B washed, uniform rusting throughout; Test Panel B unwashed similar and (Right) Test Panel B, boiling extraction method, all others similar. (Bottom row, Left): Test Panel A, surface profile measurements (ASTM D4417) prior to boil extraction, (Center) Test Panel C, surface profile measurements (ASTM D4417) prior to boil extraction and (Right) Liquid reagent sample cooling and test panels repackaged after boil extraction - 9. SEM image of Panel A (2,000 times as taken) showing surface and bulk energy-dispersive X-ray analysis (EDXA) elemental analysis showing iron, oxygen and other elements - 10. SEM image of Panel B clean surface (2,000 times as taken) showing surface and bulk EDXA elemental analysis showing iron oxide and other elements - 11. SEM image of Panel B dark surface (2,000 times as taken) showing surface and bulk EDXA elemental analysis showing iron sulfide and iron carbonate (as per XRD analysis) - 12. SEM image of Panel C (2,000 times as taken) showing etched surface from exposure to corrosive environment subsequently treated with cleaner. Surface is clean as shown by the predominantly iron peak shown in the EDX analysis - 13. (Left) At 8,000 times magnification, the surface of Panel A as blasted and (Right) Panel C after chemical treatment. Panel C shows etching effect from exposure to corrosive environment. By removing all the contaminants the chemical cleaner system has revealed the surface topography
- TABLES : 1-2. Coating 1 and 2 autoclave analysis - 3. Conductivity and surface profile measurements of test panels pre-coating application - 4. Summary of XRD resuls (wt%) |
| En ligne : |
http://www.paintsquare.com/archive/?fuseaction=view&articleid=5946 |
| Format de la ressource électronique : |
Web |
| Permalink : |
https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=28385 |
in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL) > Vol. 33, N° 11 (11/2016) . - p. 38-50
[article]
|
Aller sur edunet
Accueil
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la rechercheOil modified and waterborne polyurethane resin / G. Gündüz in JOURNAL OF COATINGS TECHNOLOGY (JCT), Vol. 74, N° 931 (08/2002)
