[article]
| Titre : |
2.5D or 3D ? |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Stefan Roth, Auteur ; Hendrik Sura ; Bernd Küster, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2004 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 65-67 |
| Note générale : |
Bibliogr. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Index. décimale : |
668.4 Plastiques, vinyles |
| Résumé : |
Practical comparison of simulation techniques - More and more 3D programs for simulating the injection moulding process have become available in recent years. Especially as regards compact geometries, the three-dimensional part meshing demonstrated here promises to deliver more accurate simulation results than conventional 2.5D simulation methods, which reduce part geometry to a shell model for the purposes of simulation. The following article uses the example of a pump component to compare the advantages and disadvantages of both simulation techniques with regard to the reproducibility of the filling pattern and their practical implementation in everyday use. |
| Permalink : |
https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=7834 |
in KUNSTSTOFFE PLAST EUROPE > Vol. 94, N° 7/2004 (07/2004) . - p. 65-67
[article]
|
Aller sur edunet
Accueil
2.5D or 3D ? in KUNSTSTOFFE PLAST EUROPE, Vol. 94, N° 7/2004 (07/2004)
