Accueil
Détail de l'auteur
Auteur H. Maibach |
Documents disponibles écrits par cet auteur
Ajouter le résultat dans votre panier Affiner la recherche
Comparing touch senses of naïve and expert panels through treated hair swatches : which associated wordings correlate with hair physical properties ? / A. Galliano in INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE, Vol. 39, N° 6 (12/2017)
[article]
Titre : Comparing touch senses of naïve and expert panels through treated hair swatches : which associated wordings correlate with hair physical properties ? Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : A. Galliano, Auteur ; J. Y. Kempf, Auteur ; Maxime Fougere, Auteur ; M. Applebaum, Auteur ; L. J. Wolfram, Auteur ; H. Maibach, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p. 653-663 Note générale : Bibliogr. Langues : Anglais (eng) Catégories : Analyse sensorielle
Cheveux -- Soins et hygiène
Etudes comparatives
ToucherIndex. décimale : 668.5 Parfums et cosmétiques Résumé : Objectives : This study (i) compared the sense of touch between a naïve and expert panels, under visual or blind conditions, using differently treated hair swatches and (ii) explored possible common wordings used by both panels and their possible links with some physical properties of hairs.
Methods : Two sets of 15 hair swatches of Caucasian and Chinese origins were differently treated (bleached, permed, brushed, etc.) or organized (root–tip vs. tip–root). These were evaluated by tactile assessments by two panels (105 naïve consumers and 10 hair experts) under visual or blind conditions, in two geographical locations. A series of 17 defined antonym adjectives, as descriptors, allowed responses of each panel to being scored and their preference mappings to being defined on a like–dislike scale. Hair swatches were measured and assessed by various instrumental techniques (bending, diameter, cuticle cohesion, alignments of hair).
Results : Apart from a few overlaps, all 15 hair swatches were well differentiated by both panels which showed a global agreement, making experts reliable assessors. Only three descriptors among 17 correlated with some objective measurements. Tactile-visual assessments differ from those performed tactile blind in both panels. Agreements between both panels appear, however, closer under tactile-blind conditions.
Conclusion : Trained hair experts were confirmed as reliable representatives of a larger and naïve cohort, viewed as consumers. Hair swatches were well differentiated by both panels, with comparable descriptor rankings.Note de contenu : - MATERIALS AND METHODS : Hair swatches - Hair treatments - Protocols - Tactile evaluation by experts and NP: visual and blind conditions - Instrumental measurements - Frictional studies - Statistics
- RESULTS : Tactile evalution by the NP and its preference mappings - Tactile evalution by experts and their preference mappings - Correlations between sensorial and objective measurementsDOI : 10.1111/ics.12428 Permalink : https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=29480
in INTERNATIONAL JOURNAL OF COSMETIC SCIENCE > Vol. 39, N° 6 (12/2017) . - p. 653-663[article]Réservation
Réserver ce document
Exemplaires (1)
Code-barres Cote Support Localisation Section Disponibilité 19393 - Périodique Bibliothèque principale Documentaires Disponible