[article]
Titre : |
An antipollution shield from sustainable sericin |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Valentina Mastria, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2020 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 139-142 |
Note générale : |
Bibliogr. |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Catégories : |
Actifs anti-pollution Cosmétiques Formulation (Génie chimique) Peau -- Soins et hygiène Séricine
|
Index. décimale : |
668.5 Parfums et cosmétiques |
Résumé : |
Particulate matter in the atmosphere has been proven to be one of the main causes of skin ageing. Studies have shown that PM0.3 - 2.5 particles condition the inflammatory response of both skin receptors and the epidermal structure.
The most recent scientific evidence suggests that the mechanisms by which environmental pollution causes damage to the skin are: free radical formation, alteration of the skin microflora, activation of the aryl hydrocarbon receptor (AhR) and of the inflammatory cascade. PM2.5 can cause alterations in the epidermis by increasing cholesterol synthesis with a transient accumulation of epidermal cholesterol content and decrease of squalene.
Data show that a pure, regenerated sericin, obtained by a circular economy process, has an anti-pollution effect, creates a protective film on the skin and hair and promotes the removal of atmospheric particulate matter. The regenerated sericin helps prevent the accumulation of particulate matter on the epidermis and improves skin appearance, making it brighter and smoother. Applied on the hair, it has shown to exert a filmforming action and promotes an ‘instant repair’ effect.
Sericin regeneration is an example of a truly circular process in which materials that have concluded their life cycle, in this case in the silk processing industry, can be recovered and give form to new, exceptional grade material. |
Note de contenu : |
- COSMETIC ACTIVITY
- ANTIPOLLUTION ACTION : Results from a clinical study - Methods and materials
- RESULTS : Evaluation of microparticle adhesion b GIMP - Evaluation of skin radiance through analysis of the parameter L - Test on strands - Methods
- Fig. 1 : Photographs at different times (T0, T2 and T3) for both areas, treated and untreated
- Fig. 2 : Number of black pixels (mean) at T2, T3. At T3, the number of black pixels were reduced compared to the previous measurement (T2) by 17.4% in the treated area and 0.4% in the untreated area (not significant)
- Fig. 3 : Evaluation of L parameter at T2 and T3 in the treated and in the untreated area
- Fig. 4 : Comparison among strands
- Fig. 5 : Hair strands stressed control (not treated)
- Fig. 6 : Hair strands stressed then treated with product
- Table 1 : Formulation tested |
En ligne : |
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1UGkaiJuIajPU_tbDMWCovCls2BQLaNk8/view?usp=drive [...] |
Format de la ressource électronique : |
Pdf |
Permalink : |
https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=33963 |
in PERSONAL CARE EUROPE > Vol. 14, N° 2 (04/2020) . - p. 139-142
[article]
|