| Titre : |
Explanations of the EU claims regulation 655/2013 |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Elisabeth Bumberger, Auteur ; Anne-Marie Burkhard, Auteur ; Andrea Keck-Wilhelm, Auteur ; Birgit Huber, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2016 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 38-42 |
| Note générale : |
Bibliogr. |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Catégories : |
Assurance qualité
Cosmétiques
Industrie cosmétique -- Législation -- Pays de l'Union Européenne
Tests d'efficacité
|
| Index. décimale : |
668.5 Parfums et cosmétiques |
| Résumé : |
These explanations are to support cosmetics manufacturers at the implementation of the provisions of the European Cosmetics Regulation (EC) No. 1223/2009 and Regulation (EU) No. 655/2013 laying clown common criteria for the justification of claims used in relation to cosmetic products adopted on its basis. They supplement the guidelines to Regulation (EU) No. 655/2013 which must likewise be observed. Furthermore, it must be taken into account that there are other advertising provisions bath on the level of the EU and on the national level to protect consumers. More detailed explanations on the "Evaluation of the efficacy of cosmetic products" can be found in the Colipa Guidelines of the same narine dating back to the year 2001. All the considerations on this topic focus on the consumer and his justified expectations concerning the effect and the properties of the respective products.
For the competent authorities it matters above all, that the evidence of the advertising daims made on the products or in other advertising forms — as far as necessary in accordante with Article 11 para 2 d) EC Cosmetics Regulation — is documented in an understandable manner in the product information file. In order to ensure this, a good communication between the manufacturers of cosmetic products and their raw material producers is required in nnany cases. It may also be necessary to take into account, for instance, the selection of a qualified external test institute, if studies with a view to a planned advertising daim are to be carried out there.
The requirements described here apply of course also to cosmetic products imported from third countries. If the manufacturer in the third country is not able to provide the responsible persan within the EU with reliable data on the claimed efficacy, the latter must himself take tare of the production of corresponding evidence. |
| Note de contenu : |
- Objective of these explanations
- Advertising claims within the meaning of article 20 EC cosmetics regulation
- Misleading and consumer expectation
- Form of the proof of efficacy
- General principles for all tests |
| En ligne : |
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1WqfocYloTvM4UkwwGnMATBxoKp4PjRtK/view?usp=drive [...] |
| Format de la ressource électronique : |
Pdf |
| Permalink : |
https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=27861 |
in SOFW JOURNAL > Vol. 142, N° 11 (11/2016) . - p. 38-42
Aller sur edunet
Accueil
Explanations of the EU claims regulation 655/2013 in SOFW JOURNAL, Vol. 142, N° 11 (11/2016)
