Improving the bottom line in water project corrosion management / Bobbi Jo E. Merten in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL), Vol. 34, N° 6 (06/2017)  

[article]  inJOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL) > Vol. 34, N° 6 (06/2017) . - p. 15-19 Titre : Improving the bottom line in water project corrosion management Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Bobbi Jo E. Merten, Auteur ; Jessica Torrey, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p. 15-19 Note générale : Bibliogr. Langues : Américain (ame) Catégories : Anticorrosion Coût -- Contrôle Durée de vie (Ingénierie) Entretien et réparations Expertises Revêtements protecteurs Tuyaux d'eau Index. décimale : 667.9 Revêtements et enduits Résumé : Life-cycle cost analysis is a powerful tool for comparing the economics of corrosion control options. It is extremely beneficial to engage the assistance of a cost estimating or economics professional when establishing an LCC evaluation technique and to ensure proper selection of the discount rate. When used in conjunction with a well-designed corrosion management plan, facilities can improve their bottom line and protect their assets from corrosion. It can also be beneficial for contractors to generally familiarize themselves with this type of process, as it can help them better understand how facility owners plan their projects, and they can prepare bids and work plans accordingly. Note de contenu : - Life-cycle costing of coating material options : Theoretical example - Penstock relining example - Life-cycle costing for cathodic protection investments - Effect of discount rate Fig. 1a. Above-ground sections of penstocks at the Shasta Powerplant in Redding, California Fig. 1b. Large scaffolding structure erected to perform coal-tar enamel repairs within a Hoover Powerplant penstock in Boulder City, Nevada Fig. 2. Reclamation staff inspecting an 85-year-old coal-tar enamel lining at the Green Mountain Powerplant in Loveland, Colorado Fig. 3. Sample of an LCC analysis spreadsheet comparing different coating options for penstock relining Fig. 4. A penstock gate equipped with a cathodic protection system is readied for placement at the Parker Dam in Arizona - Table : LCC inputs matrix for three coating options using a 2016 index year in U.S. Dollars and 1.5% discount rate En ligne : http://www.paintsquare.com/archive/?fuseaction=view&articleid=6083 Format de la ressource électronique : Web Permalink : https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=29190 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
19068	-	Périodique	Bibliothèque principale	Documentaires	Disponible

---

1 (1 - 1 / 1)