| Titre : |
Driving up environmental and social industry standards |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Martin Ricker, Intervieweur ; Christina Trautmann, Personne interviewée |
| Année de publication : |
2021 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 30-35 |
| Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
| Catégories : |
Animaux -- Protection
Chaine logistique
Cuirs et peaux -- Industrie -- Aspect de l'environnement
Déontologie professionnelle
Produits chimiques -- Sécurité
Responsabilité environnementale
Traçabilité
|
| Index. décimale : |
675 Technologie du cuir et de la fourrure |
| Résumé : |
With P7 of the LWG's protocol becoming mandatory from August 22. ILM Content Director, Martin Ricker asked Christina Trautmann, Program Manager for Leather Working Group, to tell us about the latest updates around traceability, animal welfare, chemical management and the new social compliance elements of the protocol. |
| Note de contenu : |
- Can you provide an update on the latest LWG numbers in terms of tanners audited, traders and the number of stakeholders that are members ?
- The tannery audits were suspended during the Covid-19
pandemic. What is the latest situation globally regarding live audits
?
- The next audit protocol (7.1) is due to be mandatory this August. What are the major changes or updates over the
previous protocol ?
- The LWG recently expanded its team. Who has joined and what will be their roles going forward ?
- Traceability and transparency in the leather supply chain is increasingly a hot topic. What is the LWG doing specifically in this area ?
- Following the previous question, what is the LWG doing to highlight and introduce best practice around animal welfare ?
- What new information can you provide ILM readers about restricted substances and the work of the (chemical) Supplier Sub-Group ?
- The LWG has a Trader Protocol. How robust is this when monitoring hides and skins from mixed origins or tracing splits through the supply chain ?
- Issues around sait (saline) content is tannery wastes has often been flagged as a problem area. Are you rewarding tanners for not using sait (sodium chloride) as a preservative in their processes or penalising those that do ?
- Opponents of the leather industry often try to link leather from cattle farming with deforestation. How can a brand or retailer be sure that their leather is not from an area that has been illegally deforested? Is it fair that leather should be linked to deforestation in your view ?
- Are there any plans to expand the LWG's remit further into corporate social governance ?
- Is there anything else that you would Iike to mention ? |
| En ligne : |
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1SxveWM1Q-5wVzBAa7cx5R7DhZvD-6c5l/view?usp=drive [...] |
| Format de la ressource électronique : |
Pdf |
| Permalink : |
https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=36191 |
in INTERNATIONAL LEATHER MAKER (ILM) > N° 49 (09-10/2021) . - p. 30-35
Aller sur edunet
Accueil
Driving up environmental and social industry standards in INTERNATIONAL LEATHER MAKER (ILM), N° 49 (09-10/2021)
