Titre : |
Thoughts on waterborne industrial coatings |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Auteurs : |
Clifford K. Schoff, Auteur |
Année de publication : |
2017 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 68 |
Langues : |
Américain (ame) |
Catégories : |
Revêtements -- Propriétés chimiques Revêtements en phase aqueuse -- Additifs Tension superficielle
|
Index. décimale : |
667.9 Revêtements et enduits |
Résumé : |
A pre-publication read of Cynthia Challener’s excellent article in this issue on waterborne industrial coatings led me to reflect on my knowledge and experiences in this area. She notes that far fewer commercial waterborne than solventborne industrial products are being used in the United States. People who she interviewed point out many reasons for this, including cost, application difficulties, paint user inertia, and a general attitude that waterborne coatings are not as good as solventborne ones. It is ironic that when I entered the coatings industry almost exactly 43 years ago, I was told that waterborne coatings soon would replace solventbornes in all product areas—Industrial and Automotive as well Architectural. The last-named area certainly is heavily waterborne, and waterborne electrodeposition primers are universal in Automotive along with many waterborne basecoats and a few primer surfacers. However, Industrial has not yet joined the club. There are many paint and resin companies working to change that. |
En ligne : |
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1D3FDL0kOnT00b7CWv9fC0YbnflmQtNtx/view?usp=drive [...] |
Format de la ressource électronique : |
Pdf |
Permalink : |
https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=30630 |
in COATINGS TECH > Vol. 14, N° 10 (10/2017) . - p. 68