[article]
Titre : |
Environmental life cycle assessment of leather processing industry : a case study of Bangladesh |
Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
Année de publication : |
2018 |
Article en page(s) : |
p. 18-26 |
Note générale : |
Bibliogr. |
Langues : |
Anglais (eng) |
Catégories : |
Croûte (cuir) On entend par "cuir en croûte" des cuirs ayant subi les opérations jusqu'au tannage, à l'exclusion de toute opération de corroyage ou de finissage, mais qui, par opposition aux wet-blue ont été séchés. Cuir pleine fleur Cuirs et peaux -- Industrie -- Aspect de l'environnement Cuirs et peaux -- Industrie -- Bangladesh Durée de vie (Ingénierie) Environnement -- Etudes d'impact
|
Index. décimale : |
675 Technologie du cuir et de la fourrure |
Résumé : |
Tanning industries have been vitally important to the economy of Bangladesh, yet they have been proven to be detrimental to the environment mainly due to the discharge of quantities of untreated wastewater containing chromium. Life cycle assessment (LCA) is a practical tool used to evaluate and compare the life cycle environmental impacts of a product. Using the IMPACT 2002+ methodology within the SimaPro LCA modelling tool, we have studied and compared the environmental burden of of two leather products : full-chrome leather (FCL) and chrome-retanned crust leather (CRL). In the case of both FCL and CRL, it was found that significant environmental impacts were associated with tanning, rechroming, neutralisation, deliming-bating and the acid wash processes in the production cycle. The emissions responsible for these processes except deliming-bating, are Cr(III), Cr(VI) which plays a vital role in maximising the toxicity potential and ammonia (deliming-bating) to a minor extent. Supply chain hotspots are transport for raw hides, chemicals and electricity. FCL had 5 times, 4.53 times and 2.53 times greater impact on categories of aquatic ecotoxicity, non-carcinogens and ecosystem quality respectively compared to CRL. In addition, aquatic acidification potential of FCL was greater than that of CRL, while CRL had marginally higher contribution to aquatic eutrophication. The carbon footprint of the two systems was found to be about 0.75kg CO2 equivalent per M2 of leather. The assessment shows that the FCL production system has higher environmental impact than CRL. |
Note de contenu : |
- Goal definition and scope
- Life cycle inventory
- Impact assessment method
- FIGURES : 1. System boundary of the FCL system - 2. Overall scheme of the IMPACT 2002+ framework, linking LCI results via the midpoint categories to damage categories adopted from Jolliet et al., 2003 - 3. Impact assessment at midpoint and endpoint level of FCL and CRL with contribution from the different life cycle processes - Relative contribution of each life cycle stages to all midpoint impact categories of FCL) - 5. Relative contribution of each life cycle stages to all midpoint impact categories of CRLFCL. Midpoint impact categories are denoted by 1 to 15 |
En ligne : |
https://drive.google.com/file/d/1pSaJY4AmI4t61tjgPQCwjcWuJNbdVF8e/view?usp=drive [...] |
Format de la ressource électronique : |
Pdf |
Permalink : |
https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=30010 |
in JOURNAL OF THE SOCIETY OF LEATHER TECHNOLOGISTS & CHEMISTS (JSLTC) > Vol. 102, N° 1 (01-02/2018) . - p. 18-26
[article]
|