| Titre : |
Improving the bottom line in water project corrosion management |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Bobbi Jo E. Merten, Auteur ; Jessica Torrey, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2017 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 15-19 |
| Note générale : |
Bibliogr. |
| Langues : |
Américain (ame) |
| Catégories : |
Anticorrosion
Coût -- Contrôle
Durée de vie (Ingénierie)
Entretien et réparations
Expertises
Revêtements protecteurs
Tuyaux d'eau
|
| Index. décimale : |
667.9 Revêtements et enduits |
| Résumé : |
Life-cycle cost analysis is a powerful tool for comparing the economics of corrosion control options. It is extremely beneficial to engage the assistance of a cost estimating or economics professional when establishing an LCC evaluation technique and to ensure proper selection of the discount rate. When used in conjunction with a well-designed corrosion management plan, facilities can improve their bottom line and protect their assets from corrosion. It can also be beneficial for contractors to generally familiarize themselves with this type of process, as it can help them better understand how facility owners plan their projects, and they can prepare bids and work plans accordingly. |
| Note de contenu : |
- Life-cycle costing of coating material options : Theoretical example - Penstock relining example
- Life-cycle costing for cathodic protection investments
- Effect of discount rate
Fig. 1a. Above-ground sections of penstocks at the Shasta Powerplant in Redding, California
Fig. 1b. Large scaffolding structure erected to perform coal-tar enamel repairs within a Hoover Powerplant penstock in Boulder City, Nevada
Fig. 2. Reclamation staff inspecting an 85-year-old coal-tar enamel lining at the Green Mountain Powerplant in Loveland, Colorado
Fig. 3. Sample of an LCC analysis spreadsheet comparing different coating options for penstock relining
Fig. 4. A penstock gate equipped with a cathodic protection system is readied for placement at the Parker Dam in Arizona
- Table : LCC inputs matrix for three coating options using a 2016 index year in U.S. Dollars and 1.5% discount rate |
| En ligne : |
http://www.paintsquare.com/archive/?fuseaction=view&articleid=6083 |
| Format de la ressource électronique : |
Web |
| Permalink : |
https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=29190 |
in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL) > Vol. 34, N° 6 (06/2017) . - p. 15-19
Aller sur edunet
Accueil
Improving the bottom line in water project corrosion management in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL), Vol. 34, N° 6 (06/2017)
