| Titre : |
Practical in-plant evaluation of two FBE abrasion-resistant overcoat systems |
| Type de document : |
texte imprimé |
| Auteurs : |
Emre Aksu, Auteur ; Alan Kehr, Auteur ; Matt Dabiri, Auteur |
| Année de publication : |
2016 |
| Article en page(s) : |
p. 22-29 |
| Langues : |
Américain (ame) |
| Catégories : |
Adhésion
Anticorrosion
Eau chaude
Epoxydes
Essais de résilience
Essais dynamiques
Porosité
Qualité -- Contrôle
Résistance à l'abrasion
Résistance à la fusion
Revêtement époxy lié par fusion
Revêtements -- Propriétés mécaniques
Revêtements multicouches
Revêtements protecteurs
Souplesse (mécanique)
Test d'immersion
Tuyauterie
Tuyauterie -- Protection
|
| Index. décimale : |
667.9 Revêtements et enduits |
| Résumé : |
In this article, the authors illustrate a comparison between a new flexible version of an abrasion-resistant overcoat (ARO) coating system and two ARO coatings at a total thickness of 20 mils, two single-layer fusion-bonded epoxy (FBE) coatings, and two dual-layer FBE (2LFBE) systems at a thickness of 60 mils. |
| Note de contenu : |
- Coating process
- Thickness of evaluated systems
- The cathodic disbondment test (CDT) : Short-term cathodic disbondment testing - Long-term cathodic disbondment testing - Flexibility
- Hot-water soak adhesion (HWS)
- Porosity
- FIGURES : 1. For this set of tests, a profilometer measured a peak to valley height of 70-to-100 µm (~3 – 4 mil) and an average peak count of 41/cm (104/in) - 2. Both the short- and long-term CD tests were conducted at 65 C (150 F), -3.5 V (calomel reference electrode) and a 3-percent NaCl electrolyte - 3. Short-term cathodic disbondment results - 4. Long-term cathodic disbondment results - 5. A crack on a bended sample under 40 times magnification. Any coating crack seen at 40 times magnification constituted a failure - 6. While the flexible ARO layer showed a low level of porosity, almost none was seen in the remaining samples for either layer - 7. Average passing impact resistance results
- TABLES : 1. Different coating thickness systems for the tests - 2. Average flexibility results for different mandrels - 3. Average hot water soak adhesion results - 4. Average porosity ratings of coating layers - 5. Test averages according to coating type |
| En ligne : |
http://www.paintsquare.com/archive/?fuseaction=view&articleid=5867 |
| Format de la ressource électronique : |
Web |
| Permalink : |
https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=28418 |
in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL) > Vol. 33, N° 7 (07/2016) . - p. 22-29
Aller sur edunet
Accueil
Practical in-plant evaluation of two FBE abrasion-resistant overcoat systems in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL), Vol. 33, N° 7 (07/2016)
