Auditing 101 / Alison B. Kaelin in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL), Vol. 33, N° 8 (08/2016)  

[article]  inJOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL) > Vol. 33, N° 8 (08/2016) . - p. 18-21 Titre : Auditing 101 Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alison B. Kaelin, Auteur Année de publication : 2016 Article en page(s) : p. 18-21 Langues : Américain (ame) Catégories : Evaluation Vérification interne Index. décimale : 658.02 Gestion des entreprises selon leur taille Résumé : Auditing is a critical process from all perspectives that should help identify weaknesses and opportunities for improvement. A well-planned audit can help catch gaps early in a process and avoid potentially larger and more costly mistakes later. An auditor’s personal opinion does not matter; auditors must remain impartial and rely completely on objective evidence to identify compliance or non-conformance. An auditee’s best intentions or reasons why something didn’t happen as it should have do not matter. Both the auditor and the auditee must understand that the only yardstick for compliance is the contract, audit criteria and standard requirements. Note de contenu : - PHASES OF AN AUDIT : Audit preparation - Audit performance - Audit reporting - Audit follow-up and closure - AUDITING IN ACTION En ligne : http://www.paintsquare.com/archive/?fuseaction=view&articleid=5891 Format de la ressource électronique : Web Permalink : https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=28396 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
18252	-	Périodique	Bibliothèque principale	Documentaires	Disponible

Hazardous metals and materials / Alison B. Kaelin in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL), Vol. 34, N° 10 (10/2017)  

[article]  inJOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL) > Vol. 34, N° 10 (10/2017) . - p. 17-20 Titre : Hazardous metals and materials : Paint and waste sampling and analysis Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alison B. Kaelin, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p. 17-20 Note générale : Bibliogr. Langues : Américain (ame) Catégories : Echantillonnage Peinture (produits chimiques) -- Analyse Revêtements -- Déchets:Peinture -- Déchets Substances dangereuses -- Evaluation du risque Substances dangereuses -- Identification Substances dangereuses -- Mesures de sécurité Index. décimale : 667.9 Revêtements et enduits Résumé : There are generally three things that should be done during the design and implementation of every maintenance painting project: determining what is in the existing coating, determining what is in any materials brought to and used on-site, and characterizing whether or not waste streams generated during the project are hazardous. All of us, from the office to the field, might need a few reminders about these tasks. Note de contenu : - NOT ALL TESTING IS CREATED EQUAL - WHAT IS IN THE EXISTING COATING ? : The first reason - The Second Reason - WHAT IS IN THE MATERIALS ? - WHAT WASTE STREAMS WILL BE GENERATED AND ARE THEY HAZARDOUS ? : Ignitability - Corrosivity - Reactivity - Toxicity - SOLVENT-CONTAMINATED WIPES Table : Applicable OSHA Regulations and Waste Stream Constituents En ligne : http://www.paintsquare.com/archive/?fuseaction=view&articleid=6150 Format de la ressource électronique : Web Permalink : https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=29506 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
19362	-	Périodique	Bibliothèque principale	Documentaires	Disponible

Is lead dead ? / Alison B. Kaelin in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL), Vol. 30, N° 5 (05/2013)

[article]  inJOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL) > Vol. 30, N° 5 (05/2013) . - p. 44-61 Titre : Is lead dead ? : A look back and a look forward at 20 years of bridge painting under the osha lead in construction interim final rule and other related standards Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alison B. Kaelin, Auteur Année de publication : 2013 Article en page(s) : p. 44-61 Note générale : Bibliogr. Langues : Américain (ame) Catégories : Bâtiments, travaux publics Infractions Peinture -- Teneur en plomb Plomb -- Toxicologie Statistique Index. décimale : 667.9 Revêtements et enduits Résumé : On May 4, 2013, OSHA's standard for protecting construction workers from lead exposure (29 CFR 1926.62) celebrated its 20th anniversary. Initially titled, "Lead Standard: Interim Final Rule on Lead Exposure in Construction," and now simply titled "Lead," 1926.62 was issued because of what was known at the time about the health risks of overexposure to lead—risks such as neurological disorders and reproductive problems. Despite 20 years of training and education for 1926.62 as well as enforcement of it, Occupational Safety and Health Administration (OSHA) statistical data from October 2011 through September 2012 for citations for the SIC code most commonly used for bridge painters, 1721, Painting/Paper Hanging, indicates that citations under 1926.62 remain the top regulatory finding for painting. Moreover, that finding mirrors the regulatory findings over the past 10 years. This article will report statistics on violations of 1926.62 among painting and other construction trades; summarize findings on blood lead levels and current knowledge about the health risks lead exposure poses; review 1926.62 and related regulations affecting lead exposure; and offer observations, recommendations, and questions for owners and others involved with lead paint removal on bridges and other structures. Note de contenu : - OSHA enforcement of 29 CFR 1926-62 - Blood lead levels - New studies and health effect data - Regulations : background (hen and now) - Definitions of lead in paint - HUD guidelines - Worker protection (OSHA) - Hazard communications standard - Worker certification and training (HUD/EPA) - EPA : National ambient air quality standards for lead - Clean water act (CWA) - Waste handling and disposal - Soils - Health effects and lower exposure - New sources of lead and exposure pathways - Challenges with compliance Permalink : https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=19142 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
15229	-	Périodique	Bibliothèque principale	Documentaires	Disponible

Major changes coming to hazardous waste regulations for generators / Alison B. Kaelin in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL), Vol. 34, N° 1 (01/2017)  

[article]  inJOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL) > Vol. 34, N° 1 (01/2017) . - p. 61-70 Titre : Major changes coming to hazardous waste regulations for generators Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alison B. Kaelin, Auteur Année de publication : 2017 Article en page(s) : p. 61-70 Langues : Américain (ame) Catégories : Chimie industrielle -- Législation -- Etats-Unis Déchets industriels -- Elimination Substances dangereuses Index. décimale : 667.9 Revêtements et enduits Résumé : On October 28, 2016, the United States Environmental Protection Agency (EPA) finalized changes to the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act (RCRA) hazardous waste generator regulations. The rule goes into effect April 28, 2017 and it is likely the most challenging and impactful regulatory change affecting the industrial coatings industry since the OSHA Lead Standard. Note de contenu : - WHAT IS A GENERATOR ? - WHAT CONSTITUTES HAZARDOUS WASTE ? - HAZARDOUS WASTE DETERMINATIONS : 1. Determine if the waste is excluded on listed - 2. Apply generator knowledge - 3. Testing of the waste - 4. Collection of waste samples at the point of generation - 5. Collection analysis of representative samples - ONGOING EVALUATION - ISSUES AFFECTING INDUSTRIAL PAINTING - DOCUMENTATION - PREPAREDNESS, PREVENTION AND CONTINGENCY PLANNING (PCCP) AND FIRST RESPONDERS - LABELING AND RISK COMMUNICATION - STORAGE OF IGNITABLE WASTES - MODIFICATIONS TO THE REQUIREMENTS FOR SATELLITE ACCUMULATION AREAS - TRACKING GENERATOR STATUS AND EPISODIC EVENTS - NEW CLOSURE REQUIREMENTS FOR LQG FOR CONTAINER ACCUMULATION UNITS - RECOMMENDATIONS AND CONCLUSIONS - Table : Crosswalk of previous citations to new citations for definitions and general standards En ligne : http://www.paintsquare.com/archive/?fuseaction=view&articleid=5985 Format de la ressource électronique : Web Permalink : https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=28377 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
18666	-	Périodique	Bibliothèque principale	Documentaires	Disponible

Root cause analysis and corrective action : turning problems into solutions / Alison B. Kaelin in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL), Vol. 35, N° 4 (04/2018)  

[article]  inJOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL) > Vol. 35, N° 4 (04/2018) . - p. 19-23 Titre : Root cause analysis and corrective action : turning problems into solutions Type de document : texte imprimé Auteurs : Alison B. Kaelin, Auteur Année de publication : 2018 Article en page(s) : p. 19-23 Langues : Américain (ame) Catégories : Analyse des défaillances (fiabilité) Vérification interne Index. décimale : 657.45 Audit Résumé : The coatings industry at all levels is becoming increasingly subject tu auditing by a variety of entities. The American Society for Quality (ASQ) defines an audit as a “systematic, independent and documented process for obtaining audit evidence (records, statements of fact or other information which are relevant and verifiable) and evaluating it objectively to determine the extent to which the audit criteria (set of policies, procedures or requirements) are fulfilled." Audits are performed by certification organizations such as SSPC Qualification Procedures(QP),the NACE International Institute Contractor Accreditation Program (NIICAP), ASIC Sophisticated Endorsement for Fabrication or Painting (AISC SPE 420) or against various International Standards Organization (ISO) programs for laboratory analysis, calibration and quality. Work related to nuclear work generally involves auditing against 40 CFR 50, Appendix B or ASME NQA-I standard, "Quality Assurance Requirements for Nuclear Facility Applications." Many large manufacturing or construction projects also perform supplier audits on current and potential vendors or contractors. Audits should also be internal and ongoing. These internal audits are generally performed on processes, employees, procedures and other functions used to control quality. SSPC's QP programs require an annual internal audit. So, you got audited, or performed an internal audit of your own company. Obviously, there were some findings. Now what ? Requests for correcting nonconformities or findings commonly result from any type of audit. Corrective action is action taken to eliminate the causes of the nonconformity, defect or other situation in order to prevent recurrence. Corrective action is reactive and is about eliminating the cause of a current problem. Preventive action is action taken to eliminate the causes of future issues— a proactive approach. Most corrective actions fait because they treat the symptoms or perceived symptoms, but never address the cause. Addressing the symptoms instead of the cause leads to a temporaty or partial fix. For example, if you have high dry-film thickness (DFT) readings and only correct if by reducing the applied DFT to resolve that single problem, you may not learn why the DFT readings were high in the first place. Maybe the Bauges weren't calibrated properly, leading to inaccurate readings, or perhaps the applicators did not receive adequate training in the equipment and methods they were using. This is where root cause analysis comes in handy. Note de contenu : - ROOT CAUSE ANALYSIS : Five "Why"s - Fishbone diagram - IMPLEMENTING CORRECTIVE ACTIONS - Fig. 1 : A sample root cause analysis (RCA diagram - Fig. 2 : A fishbone diagram displays the possible causes of a problem - Fig. 3 : This completed fishbone diagram show some of the root causes for high DFT readings En ligne : https://www.paintsquare.com/archive/?fuseaction=view&articleid=6289 Format de la ressource électronique : Html Permalink : https://e-campus.itech.fr/pmb/opac_css/index.php?lvl=notice_display&id=30685 [article]

Réservation

Réserver ce document

Exemplaires (1)

Code-barres	Cote	Support	Localisation	Section	Disponibilité
19882	-	Périodique	Bibliothèque principale	Documentaires	Disponible

Shipyard regulatory update / Alison B. Kaelin in JOURNAL OF PROTECTIVE COATINGS & LININGS (JPCL), Vol. 31, N° 3 (03/2014)

Permalink

---

1 (1 - 6 / 6)